• About
RSS  Subscribe:  RSS feed
Random Hacks
Hacks, code and other things

Myth: Repositories should have one way in and one way out.

Posted on January 14, 2008

0


Repository managers can no longer rely on items – and the metadata about those items – getting into the repository through their own carefully worked ingest web service.

We need to make sure that this doesn’t become problematic further down the line and that we, in turn, do not create problems or obstacles for other services using the disseminated data.

I think that, from the point of view of an institutional repository, we really need to start working with the user as soon as possible, and while this can be mostly a political problem, we have to make sure that the technical barrier is as low as possible.

We have to be less arrogant about our services and more pragmatic about what is already out there. I mean, it should be obvious that it is not possible to design a single workflow or web service that everyone will happily and accurately use. Also, it should be obvious that the time it would take to customise the ingest and edit mechanism for each group of users is infeasible.

So, what’s the alternative? We need to look longer and harder at the existing and emergent content repositories out there, especially those that people already use without much provocation. Flickr is a prime example of what I am talking about, and services such as google docs, blogging platforms and even Amazon may be very good sources for information that the user cares about and has already put into a ‘machine-understandable’ form.

My question then: Why shouldn’t we take the following requests very seriously indeed?

“I have a collection of images on Flickr that I want to archive in your repository. It is at X url, that’s all the info you need, right? I have a profile held at Y location.”

or the more common:

“I need to put a couple of papers online for RAE – I’ll email you the files. I’m a busy guy, I’ve told research services all the details, get it from them.”

And finally, I found this, and I think it speaks for itself.

(From Language Log blog, talking about this workshop :)

With the objective of providing a more creative environment for scholarship, assume the following goal:

By 2015, all publicly-funded research products and primary resources will be readily available, accessible, and usable via common infrastructure and tools through space, time, and across disciplines, stages of research, and modes of human expression.

* Identify the intermediate tasks, resources, and enabling conditions
* Sketch a roadmap with major tracks and milestones to achieve the goal

I do like that. I like that assumption a lot. While we probably can never achieve the aims, at least having it in mind will help in the long run when designing or thinking about new services.

About these ads

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in: idea, metadata, opinion, repository
← Image Annotation using common XML namespaces
Update →
Be the first to start a conversation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Categories

  • alanturingmemorial
  • archive
  • bagit
  • blog
  • bloginfo
  • citation
  • contenttype
  • creativity
  • crigshow
  • dataflow
  • dev8d python twitter tagging spreadsheet data google
  • development
  • diagram
  • encoding
  • event
  • fedora
  • fonts
  • formats
  • fun
  • howto
  • idea
  • identifier
  • Intro
  • linux
  • metadata
  • motivation
  • oaiore
  • oaipmh
  • opinion
  • ORCID
  • osdiii
  • packaging
  • pairtree
  • play
  • python
  • rdf
  • redis
  • repository
  • rss
  • search
  • serialisation
  • statistics
  • Trackback
  • Uncategorized
  • unicode
  • usage
  • uuid

Archives

  • February 2013 (1)
  • October 2012 (1)
  • September 2012 (5)
  • August 2012 (1)
  • May 2012 (2)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • January 2012 (4)
  • October 2011 (3)
  • September 2011 (5)
  • August 2011 (2)
  • July 2011 (3)
  • June 2011 (1)
  • February 2011 (2)
  • January 2011 (2)
  • September 2010 (6)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • April 2010 (1)
  • March 2010 (3)
  • February 2010 (2)
  • January 2010 (1)
  • October 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (1)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (2)
  • February 2009 (4)
  • December 2008 (1)
  • November 2008 (4)
  • October 2008 (3)
  • August 2008 (5)
  • July 2008 (3)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (3)
  • April 2008 (3)
  • February 2008 (6)
  • January 2008 (5)
  • December 2007 (11)
Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Inuit Types by BizzArtic.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: